Functional programming a brief introduction to Scala

In this blogpost I’ll try to explain on a very basic level what functional programming (FP) is about. look at is as an introduction to the amazing world of FP. FP is already here for quite a few decades. It was mostly used in the academic world and specialized industries. Since the coming of Scala, FP became more and more mainstream.

So what is functional programming?

(from Wikipedia In computer sciencefunctional programming is a programming paradigm, a style of building the structure and elements of computer programs, that treats computation as the evaluation of mathematical functions and avoids changing-state and mutable data. It is a declarative programming paradigm, which means programming is done with expressions. In functional code, the output value of a function depends only on the arguments that are input to the function, so calling a function f twice with the same value for an argument x will produce the same resultf(x) each time. Eliminating side effects, i.e. changes in state that do not depend on the function inputs, can make it much easier to understand and predict the behavior of a program, which is one of the key motivations for the development of functional programming.

Installing Scala

I’m using the scala Read-Evaluate-Print-Loop (REPL) to show you the examples. It’s basically a Scala commandline interpreter. Just get the latest version of scala and install it. To get started with scala REPL, open a command prompt or terminal session; go to the directory where you installed scala and further to the bin directory. Enter the command scala or ./scala and you’re ready to go!


Scala Command line REPL


Scala is a programming language that mixes paradigms of both FP and OO. Scala uses its own compiler (scalac) to compile your code to byte code. Probably the biggest advantage of Scala is that it runs on your standard java infrastructure. It is even capable of calling your java code and visa versa although you need to take special care when integrating both languages. It’s functional As the name already states, functional programming allows the developer write your code on a functional level. In other words you don’t have to translate your functional solution to a lower, technical, level. If I want to know the outcome of: all even numbers between 1 and 10 and multiplied them by 2, you write in Scala

(1 to 10).toList.filter(_ % 2 == 0).map(_ * 2)

While in java it looks more like this

List input = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10}.toList();
List results = new ArrayList();
for(int val : input) {
  if(val % 2 == 0) {
    results.add(val * 2);
return results;

Looking at the Scala code you will notice a few things.

  • The code is expressive and readable. No clutter, no unnecessary boiler plate code.
  • There is no assignment of variables (stateless)
  • Functions (_ % 2) and (_ * 2) is added as argument to a method
    • The underscore (_) represents a wildcard. In this case, each element of the list


Scala, as all functional languages, is an expressive language. But what does it mean? First of all, it makes your code much more readable. You almost program what you say. A friend of mine, who’s working in the travel business, understood a Scala code snippet, while the java counterpart was Chinese for her. Is this important? Yes, if you know that code is read 10 times more than written.
Secondly expressions return values. Which can lead to less code.

Boilerplate code be gone!

The guys from Scala did their best to make the code as clean as possible. Every character unnecessary to run your code can be made obsolete. This includes ( ) for zero argument method calls, semi colons ‘;’, points ‘.’ etc… The scala compiler is quite intelligent and will do all the hard work for you to convert the dense code into the full-blown byte code.

Values and variables

var myName = “Ief”
myName: String = Ief

As you can see, it is not mandatory to define a type. Still Scala is strongly typed and knows that it is a String. Strongly typed means that you don’t need to define types a lot. Confused?

val myName = “Ief”

is the same as

 val myName : String = “Ief” 

Once the type of a variable or value is assigned you don’t need to repeat it again. Val represent a value, a final variable named ‘name’ of the type Sting with only an accesor method (getter).

var myName = “Ief”

Is a variable named name of the type String with an accesor method (getter) and a mutator method (setter)


A class Person with a variable name and a value surname would look like this in Scala

 class Person(var name : String, val surname : String) 

While the java counterpart would look like this

public class Person {
  private String name;
  private final String surname;

  public Person(final String surname) {
    this.surname = surname;

  public String getName();
    return name;

  public void setName(final String name) { = name;

  public String getSurname();
    return surname;

You can instantiate the class using the following code

val me = new Person(“Ief”, “Cuynen”)
me: Person = Person@4d826d77
res7: String = Ief = “Jef” String = Jef

res8: String = Cuynen

me.surname = "Peeters"
res9: error: reassignment to val

You probably noticed that for zero argument methods you can skip the ( ) Scala is packed with syntactic sugar. A few more examples:

Regular expressions can be created just by calling the r method on a String

val regularExpression = “[0-9][a-Z]”.r

A Range of numbers from 1 to 10

1 to 10
res11: scala.collection.immutable.Range.Inclusive = Range(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10)


Functions are defined using the def keyword. Every function returns the value of the last statement of the function, even without an explicit return statement. It is even possible to return a new function as return value.

def addOne(x: Int): Int = x +1
addOne: (x: Int)Int

res12: Int = 3

In scala it is also possible to return multiple values in 1 go by using tuples. Tuples are a way to group different values of different types into a single container without creating an explicit class.

def printStuff(x : Int): (Int, String)  = (x, "Hello number " + x)
printStuff: (x: Int)(Int, String)

res13: (Int, String) = (1,Hello number 1)

Functions can be used as arguments for other functions. This way it is possible to add behaviour.

def isEven(x : Int): Boolean =  x % 2 == 0
def isUneven(x : Int): Boolean = x % 2 == 1

(1 to 10).filter(isEven(_))
res20: scala.collection.immutable.IndexedSeq[Int] = Vector(2, 4, 6, 8, 10)

(1 to 10).filter(isUneven(_))
res21: scala.collection.immutable.IndexedSeq[Int] = Vector(1, 3, 5, 7, 9)

Using functions as arguments greatly reduce the need for subclassing. Normally a subclass is used to ‘bind’ different behaviour to the same interface. By using functions as arguments, the behaviour is injected into interface.

Functions can be even combined into other functions which are called high order functions.


Using null values is FP and Scala is a very bad practice. When you think about it, null values are pure evil in any programming for that matter. They cause unwanted side effects and you need to always check for null values to prevent NullPointerExceptions. Within Scala you can use the Option counterpart which is a decent way to solve the null evilness.

scala> def convertToInt(x: String): Option[Int] = {
     |    try {
     |        Some(Integer.parseInt(x))
     |     } catch {
     |        case e: Exception => None
     |    }
     | }
convertToInt: (x: String)Option[Int]

This function parses a String to an Int. In case the String can be successfully parsed, the Int value is returned (Some). In case an exception is thrown, None is returned

scala> convertToInt("1")
res22: Option[Int] = Some(1)
scala> convertToInt("abc")
res23: Option[Int] = None

To get the actual value, the getOrElse function can be called on the Option.

scala> val x = convertToInt("1").getOrElse(0)
x: Int = 1
scala> val x = convertToInt("abc").getOrElse(0)
x: Int = 0

Another way to get the value of the Option is to use a matcher.

scala> convertToInt("1") match {
     |     case Some(x) => println(x)
     |     case None => println("That String was not really an Int was it?")
     | }

scala> convertToInt("abc") match {
     |     case Some(x) => println(x)
     |     case None => println("That String was not really an Int was it?")
     | }
That String was not really an Int was it?

Pattern matching

You already saw above what you can do with a matcher. Look at it as the Java switch on steroids. It can match about any everything.

scala> def matchThis(x : Any) = x match {
     |     case 1 => println(1)
     |     case s : String => println("Match String " + s)
     |     case _ => println("whatever")
     | }
matchThis: (x: Any)Unit

scala> matchThis(1)

scala> matchThis("abc")
Match String abc

scala> matchThis(true)


One of the caveats is that the java compiler does not compile scala and the scala compiler does not compile java. So 2-way dependencies probably lead to a big headache.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

About Ief Cuynen